October 4, 2022


WASHINGTON, April 11 (Reuters) – U.S. asset managers are pushing again on draft guidelines geared toward fixing systemic dangers within the $5 trillion cash market funds business, arguing that one of many proposed measures would kill off in style merchandise, executives instructed Reuters.

After taxpayers bailed out cash market funds, a key supply of short-term company and municipal funding, for the second time in 12 years through the pandemic-induced turmoil of 2020, the business is dealing with renewed regulatory scrutiny.

Cash market funds spend money on high-quality short-term debt devices and supply each day redemptions. Buyers anticipate quick liquidity with little worth volatility and are spooked when these expectations will not be met throughout market stress.

Register now for FREE limitless entry to Reuters.com

Because the pandemic shut down the financial system in March 2020, buyers pulled greater than $130 billion from some cash market funds, contributing to emphasize within the short-term funding markets, in accordance with a Treasury evaluation that’s disputed by the funds business.

In December, the Securities and Change Fee (SEC) proposed boosting cash market funds’ resilience by, amongst different measures, adjusting a funds’ worth in keeping with buying and selling exercise in order that redeeming buyers bear the prices of exiting a fund and do not dilute remaining buyers. In principle, this “swing pricing” reduces the inducement to run to the exit first.

The deadline to submit feedback is Monday and the business is pushing again onerous on the swing pricing measures, arguing they’d be operationally difficult, impose extreme prices on fund sponsors, and scale back each day liquidity for buyers.

“We actually do consider that it might kill the product,” mentioned Jane Heinrichs, affiliate
common counsel on the Funding Firm Institute, which represents the asset managers. “Funds would decide it isn’t definitely worth the adjustments essential to make it work for a product that may now not meet the wants of buyers.”

The SEC has offered no knowledge to help the thought, Heinrichs mentioned.

Whereas swing pricing is utilized by some European funds, it’s an unfamiliar idea to U.S. buyers, mentioned Peter Yi, a director at Northern Belief Asset Administration. “For sure, swing pricing goes to be very troublesome for buyers to know.”

An SEC spokesperson didn’t instantly present remark.

To calm fleeing buyers and stem a broader disaster, the Treasury and Federal Reserve in March 2020 launched emergency liquidity services to backstop the market. The panic was paying homage to 2008, when a run on cash market funds likewise prompted the U.S. authorities to prop up the market.

That bailout led the SEC in 2010 and 2014 to introduce guidelines geared toward decreasing the chance of investor runs. However 2020 confirmed these adjustments have been insufficient, mentioned regulatory consultants.

Advocacy teams say cash market funds are working with an implicit authorities assure, with out the stringent capital and liquidity necessities such ensures often require.

“The federal government is actually giving personal enterprise – the cash market fund sponsors – billions and billions a yr for nothing,” mentioned Dennis Kelleher, president of the Washington-based advocacy group Higher Markets. “After which when there’s market stress, they do not need to cowl the draw back.”

His group is looking for wholesale reforms that go additional than the SEC’s proposal, together with bank-like capital buffers.

Whereas the Funding Firm Institute opposes swing pricing, it helps in precept the SEC’s proposal to lift funds’ liquidity necessities, and to permit fund boards extra flexibility to cost for or droop redemptions throughout stress, identified a fund “gate.”

In 2020, investor runs accelerated as funds approached a minimal liquidity threshold that, below the present guidelines, permits fund boards to gate redemptions. The SEC rule would get rid of that shiny line.

“By de-linking the charges and gates from the liquidity thresholds and growing the liquidity ranges, you straight deal with the problems from 2020,” Heinrichs mentioned.

Register now for FREE limitless entry to Reuters.com

Reporting by Michelle Worth; Enhancing by Leslie Adler

Our Requirements: The Thomson Reuters Belief Rules.



Supply hyperlink